ewx: (Default)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2003-09-16 12:48 pm
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2003-09-16 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
On the contrary - if you don't tick anything it doesn't mention you at all. So there could be dozens of non-tickers...
gerald_duck: (Default)

[personal profile] gerald_duck 2003-09-16 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh.

Bloody quirkly polls mechanism.

Is there any way to offload the entire poll dataset and manipulated it yourself in comprehensible ways, I wonder?

[identity profile] imc.livejournal.com 2003-09-17 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
According to the percentages listed just now, 28 people answered the first part and 29 people answered the second part.

So if you don't vote in the radio-button poll then you don't affect the percentages in any way. I suppose this might be the appropriate way to do the calculation. I suspect this may also apply to the ticky-box poll, but I'm much less certain that that's the right way to compute the result (because `none of the above' may well be a valid answer).