ewx: (Default)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2003-10-01 11:30 am

(no subject)

Apropos of this thread, I think that both beauty and fun are subsets of useful (especially in a Maslowian kind of way). Listing a thing useful only for its beauty under 'useful' would be subverting the question, fairly obviously, but given the absence of explicit mention of fun I think that I'd have put fun things under 'useful' if anywhere, were I to answer my own question.

[identity profile] ghoti.livejournal.com 2003-10-01 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
They're useful in that they make beautiful things. Or at least, that's my theory.