ewx: (Default)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2003-11-19 02:43 pm

[identity profile] songster.livejournal.com 2003-11-19 07:03 am (UTC)(link)
Well yes. But my reasoning then continued that because</> it's difficult (actually, impossible) to swim an exact integer number of lengths, ewx was treating lengths as quanta for the purpose of the comment, hence 'fewer' would be technically more precise.