ext_6219 ([identity profile] gareth-rees.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ewx 2006-06-13 10:56 am (UTC)

Of course, public understanding is not helped when the prosection lawyer makes such misleading comments as the one quoted by the BBC:
"The judge has to determine first of all the notional sentence, which in this case was 18 years. Then that is cut by half to reach the actual sentence. Then the judge is obliged to cut a third off in view of the guilty plea."
By "notional sentence" he means "maximum term spent in prison". By "actual sentence" he means "tariff, i.e. minimum term spent in prison before he becomes eligible for parole". In fact, this quote is so misleading that if it was reported accurately I can't believe it wasn't intended as deliberate misinformation.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org