ewx: (Default)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2007-01-25 01:12 pm
Entry tags:

[identity profile] pjc50.livejournal.com 2007-01-25 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel that this needs the "and valuable" qualifier - I have lots of irreplacable logs that are of almost no value at all.

[identity profile] angoel.livejournal.com 2007-01-25 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed. I'm sure I've lost irreplacable data in the past, but I can't remember what it was, and suspect that if I still had it, I'd look at it quizically and ask myself 'what was that all about, then?'
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2007-01-25 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I think there's an implication of non-interchangeability. Your six-year-old's first painting is irreplaceable because some other kid's painting won't do; someone else's six-year-old's first painting is not irreplaceable because one such painting is likely to be of as much interest to you as any other, even though when your house burns down you won't be able to get exactly the same painting back.