[identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com 2007-07-26 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
If Matthew had got the E'burgh job there would have been a period when we were married but not cohabiting.

(Interestingly, I wonder if there's a pattern between more traditionally minded people just ticking "married"... but probably not.)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)

[personal profile] lnr 2007-07-26 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
See this is another reason why it's silly to base things on whether people are cohabiting. I suspect you'd still have joint finances of some sort even if living at opposite ends of the country though.

And I know married people don't have to be cohabiting, I just think the fact that a bunch of people all in the same situation ticking different combinations was interesting, and skewing the graph somewhat.

[identity profile] david jones (from livejournal.com) 2007-07-26 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
AFAIUI cohabitation is one of the few remaining legally enforceable parts of the marriage contract.

[identity profile] pjc50.livejournal.com 2007-07-26 04:33 pm (UTC)(link)
In what sense - that marriage entitles you to live with someone who doesn't want you to, or that it entitles you to retrieve your spouse and make them live with you? I can't see either of those getting past ECHR...

[identity profile] david jones (from livejournal.com) 2007-07-26 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)
In the sense that not cohabiting is sufficient to prove that the contract has not been fulfilled and therefore grounds for divorce.