ext_36142 ([identity profile] truecatachresis.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ewx 2007-09-19 12:20 pm (UTC)

Nobody bought NR because they couldn't borrow the money to do so; that doesn't mean NR isn't solvent. Several banks were interested in buying it, and were convinced it was solvent, but the inter-bank lending just isn't working properly at the moment, so couldn't do so. The BoE only agreed to the emergency loan because they were convinced it was solvent; they would not agree to emergency loans to cover the purchase.

I absolutely agree we shouldn't bail out NR if isn't solvent - that's not what has happened, and not what has been proposed. I think promising to cover all depositors was probably not the right choice, but a continued run on the bank was a bad option.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org