ewx: (Default)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2008-06-23 08:50 am
Entry tags:

[identity profile] geekette8.livejournal.com 2008-06-23 10:01 am (UTC)(link)
Lots of people do this. If you google (with quotes) "factoring large primes" you'll see it all over the place. Drives me nutty.
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2008-06-23 11:09 am (UTC)(link)
I have this great tool for factoring large primes, just send me £1,000,000 and I'll let you have a copy...

[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com 2008-06-23 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Does it successfully reject invalid inputs, or produce an undefined[1] result? :)

[1] I say "undefined", but I think I know what it's going to be :)

(Yes, the phrase "factorising large primes" really bugs me too -- even more so because I actually recognise in myself a tendency to say it, so although wrong, it must have _some_ resonance with what it ought to mean.)
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2008-06-24 08:41 am (UTC)(link)

Too many zeroes in the price for error checking l-)

(...actually I'd quite happily spend a few weeks bashing in primality testing algorithms if there was a certain million in it. But there isn't l-)