Mirren

[ewx]

Does anyone agree with Helen Mirren? Or Anne Widdecombe (do the Conservatives reject the label “the party of law and order” now then?)

What's she asking for? A cup of tea?

...well, why not? Hasn't she heard the REM song?

Comments

[beckyc.livejournal.com]

Is that just how you would/may feel in that circumstance though, or how you would expect/hope/similar other people would/should/may feel in similar circumstance?

[I suspect that interviews of someone saying the former could easily be twisted to appear to be saying the latter, which could be unfortunate. I have been wondering if that is what has happened here.]

[lnr]

Oh I absolutely recognise that there are situations which I might not feel violated in but which someone else would, and would support their claim to have been raped. And if they wanted to press charges I'd support them even if I'd not do the same for myself, yes.

I think there are probably some *very* hard (and rare) edge cases where someone feels raped even though the perpetrator couldn't have been expected to realise it would have that affect. In which case I'd feel pretty sorry for both parties.

[ewx.livejournal.com]

I don't think anyone's suggesting that people be forced to prosecute - Helen Mirren's remarks are being interpreted (fairly or otherwise!) as suggesting that in some instances they shouldn't be able to invoke the law.

Anne Widdecombe appears (in the second link) to be agreeing with the remarks as interpreted this way. Though of course caution is sensible here too, it's critical to know what exactly she though she was responding to.