ext_8103: (Default)
ext_8103 ([identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ewx 2012-01-28 08:13 pm (UTC)

I don’t recall coming across much that was architecture-dependent in my travels, my somewhat superficial impression is of a good portability job. The reporting is completely different on no-MMU platforms so there’s no scope for confusion there.

VmExe could in principle be binary-format-dependent (since that’s where startcode/endcode are filled in) but I think it would be a bug if it was; to the extent that it means anything it means that your executable is that big. The reason I say it’s meaningless is that you could just look at the executable; it’s not like it changes.

I suppose the points about JIT compilers adding to some of the figures is false on platforms too obscure for anyone to have ported their JIT to them l-)

Good point about thread stacks inflating vsize, and one I should have thought of as I’ve had a correspondent be confused by it in the past.


Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org