ext_140295 ([identity profile] bjh21.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] ewx 2012-08-07 04:50 pm (UTC)

Note that there was a different law used in the Chambers cases (http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2012/2157.html), namely section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/ukpga/2003/21/section/127) (which was commenced by SI 2003/1900 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/uksi/2003/1900)). This is where "menacing" comes from, and notably lacks the purpose requirement of the 1988 Act.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org