Richard Kettlewell (
ewx
) wrote
2003
-
11
-
15
10:56 am
(no subject)
[
Poll #205281
]
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
lusercop.livejournal.com
2003-11-15 03:04 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Hmmm, that seems broken, it will always come up with 100%, because it doesn't record your submission unless you tick the box.
no subject
ewx.livejournal.com
2003-11-15 03:05 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Livejournal in 'being crap' shocker...
no subject
ewx.livejournal.com
2003-11-15 03:35 am (UTC)
(
link
)
'who ticked the box' is perhaps more interesting than who didn't though l-)
no subject
lusercop.livejournal.com
2003-11-15 05:54 am (UTC)
(
link
)
:-) True
no subject
ceb.livejournal.com
2003-11-15 07:06 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Next: "Please do not tick this box again"?
no subject
ewx.livejournal.com
2003-11-15 07:08 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I think it would be a different box...
no subject
brrm.livejournal.com
2003-11-15 06:37 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Or would it, since it would presumably stem from the same data describing a tickybox in your OS/browser.
A tickybox by any other name...
7 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
A tickybox by any other name...