ewx: (poll)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2008-04-01 01:32 pm
Entry tags:

[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com 2008-04-01 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
*hug* OK, that makes sense. (My brain is thinking "Agh! Unromantic inefficiency". But then, I'm not normal. And would probably think differently *in* bed :))
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)

[personal profile] lnr 2008-04-01 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not in the nature of being romantic, it's in the nature of being silly. This is very much my nature.

[identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com 2008-04-01 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
And being silly definitely is romantic (eg. because you're so relaxed it doesn't matter, romance is difficult if it has to be serious, witness how people in love always laugh), just that for me personally an emphasis on analysing the most efficient nature of communication narrowly pips it to the post :)