ewx: (poll)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2008-06-03 04:41 pm
Entry tags:
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2008-06-03 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
(FSVO emacs, that is.)
emperor: (Default)

[personal profile] emperor 2008-06-03 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
[x] on the office whiteboard

[identity profile] imc.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I sometimes avoid discarding envelopes that I have already written on, but I don't think this is what's meant by that poll option.

[identity profile] aardvark179.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Obviously I don't carve the rough calculations on the moon, that's only for the final typeset output using dvi2lazcannon.
aldabra: (Default)

[personal profile] aldabra 2008-06-03 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
[X] Windows' calculator.
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (bofh)

[identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
[X] in my shell with expr
[x] with bc
Edited 2008-06-03 15:53 (UTC)

[identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
In excel. I think I've been brainwashed
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)

[personal profile] lnr 2008-06-03 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I also often use a post-it note, since they are a useful size for this and to hand, but really that's a bit wasteful.
sparrowsion: (psychedelic)

[personal profile] sparrowsion 2008-06-03 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
[X] at the Python interactive prompt (which I have several of lying around my workspaces for precisely this purpose).
[X] with Windows' shit-for-brains calculator on my phone.
[X] in my notebook.
Edited 2008-06-03 16:13 (UTC)

[identity profile] the-local-echo.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I have a peculiar habit of never opening the payslips delivered to my desk at work, because that risks reducing the amount of space available on the back of the envelope, and increases the chance of the envelope getting thrown away by the cleaners.

It's a sad time of the month when the payslip envelope is completely filled and I have to resort to the backs of timesheets, or, as a last resort, an interactive prompt. Maybe I need to sign myself up for more junk mail at work.

[identity profile] naath.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 04:12 pm (UTC)(link)
[x] with the aid of Google's calculator function (it knows many more useful numbers than most other handy calculating tools). Or sometimes on whatever paper happens to be around.

[identity profile] pjc50.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
dc in arithmetic quick do i
p

(Thinking is easier on paper, especially as soon as you want a diagram)
ext_44: (power)

[identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I sometimes actually use a calculator to perform calculations, like taking the average of four numbers.

*is more ashamed than proud of this*

[identity profile] davefish.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I do my scrap of paper calculations about moon carving lasers.
ext_3241: (Default)

[identity profile] pizza.maircrosoft.com (from livejournal.com) 2008-06-03 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
google. I would use a scrap of paper but I can never find a pen(cil).

[identity profile] sphyg.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Also using Excel, Windows calculator or perl -e.

[identity profile] gnimmel.livejournal.com 2008-06-03 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
...but more frequently using command-line perl.
gerald_duck: (Default)

[personal profile] gerald_duck 2008-06-03 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[x] On the next few lines of the A4 pad I keep on my desk for this and similar purpouses.

[identity profile] saraphale.livejournal.com 2008-06-04 09:24 am (UTC)(link)
[x] in Octave

[identity profile] david jones (from livejournal.com) 2008-06-06 08:23 am (UTC)(link)
[X] in my logbook
[X] in awk (and [X] Python, and [X] JavaScript interactive prompt, and [X] Lisp)
[X] in dc

I used awk sufficiently often that I wrote a very short wrapper around it to evaluate and print a single expression.

and very occasionally:
[X] in C
which is to say I'll actually write a complete program in C to do some throwaway calculation.

These days I seem to be inspecting the behaviour of floating point arithmetic a lot. For that, JavaScript is surprisingly useful because: a) 64-bit IEEE double guaranteed; and, b) parsimonious printing of floating point values so you get exactly the right number of decimal digits printed.