ewx: (poll)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2008-08-14 10:47 am
Entry tags:

Inbox size

[Poll #1241657]

(Memory and browser history strongly imply I've done this poll before, but I can't find the actual poll...)

[identity profile] addedentry.livejournal.com 2008-08-14 10:45 am (UTC)(link)
Inbox Zero at work. I've never understood using the inbox as a filing cabinet.

Mind you, I had one boss who'd been using Outlook's 'Deleted Items' folder as an archive for years and got very upset when it was, er, deleted...
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2008-08-14 11:10 am (UTC)(link)
I've heard of people using 'trash' directories for long-term storage too. Completely baffling.
ext_22879: (Default)

[identity profile] nja.livejournal.com 2008-08-14 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I narrowly avoided deleting months of someone's work once - it was in a directory called 'temp', and I assumed that emptying it was a good way to free a few gigabytes of space on a full disk.

My inbox has 138 items, all read. If there's something that needs dealing with later I move it to a folder called "to do", and anything older than a week gets shifted to an archive (which goes back about ten years). I regularly see colleagues with hundreds of unread emails - one (thankfully now departed) used to let them pile up for weeks and then deal with them all at once, so I'd get replies to half a dozen urgent enquiries on a Sunday afternoon six weeks after I had found out the information by ringing her secretary.