Inbox size
Aug. 14th, 2008 10:47 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Poll #1241657]
(Memory and browser history strongly imply I've done this poll before, but I can't find the actual poll...)
(Memory and browser history strongly imply I've done this poll before, but I can't find the actual poll...)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 09:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 10:02 am (UTC)7 in my gmail inbox
105 in my work inboxThe chiark ones need replying to, the gmail ones are mostly stuff I need to refer to in the immediate future (holiday and train bookings, house buying related), the work stuff is mostly the latter sort (though work-related obv). Actually a few of those were a conversation on my current project which I thought I might need to contribute to, but it's now resolved, so I've filed those.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 10:10 am (UTC)earth.li inbox: 0
work inbox: 65 (slowly whittling down from hundreds)
I am aiming for across-the-board Inbox Zero. Getting there, slowly.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 10:45 am (UTC)Mind you, I had one boss who'd been using Outlook's 'Deleted Items' folder as an archive for years and got very upset when it was, er, deleted...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 11:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 04:11 pm (UTC)My inbox has 138 items, all read. If there's something that needs dealing with later I move it to a folder called "to do", and anything older than a week gets shifted to an archive (which goes back about ten years). I regularly see colleagues with hundreds of unread emails - one (thankfully now departed) used to let them pile up for weeks and then deal with them all at once, so I'd get replies to half a dozen urgent enquiries on a Sunday afternoon six weeks after I had found out the information by ringing her secretary.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 10:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 10:54 am (UTC)Inbox Zero is a great idea and I keep trying to get better at doing it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 11:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 11:26 am (UTC)Not that it's anything to be proud of, ahem...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-18 04:48 pm (UTC)Mind you, I do have a directory called old-mail with subdirectories called ox-read-mail and ox-sent-mail, with files dating back to 1995, and my current inbox has mail in from 1997. I'd be tempted to switch to GMail or similar if I were confident about being able to import and export close to 1 GB of mail.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 11:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 11:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 11:39 am (UTC)~1500 in personal inbox (argh!)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 11:49 am (UTC)I'm not sure I get the point of Inbox Zero.
What's the point?
Date: 2008-08-14 06:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 01:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 02:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 02:15 pm (UTC)23 in home in box, 25 in Gmail, 23 in main inbox.Now 5 at work, 13 at home. Gmail remains disaster area in need of love and attention. Maybe next week when I'm working half-time, if Charles naps conveniently.
I was at 1 & 7 earlier in the week. I am trying to decide if I want to actually have an 'Action Required' mailbox for each hat, which will allow me to reach 0 in each inbox, or whether that's wasteful window-dressing.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 07:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-15 10:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 04:15 pm (UTC).... ok, my answer remains the same.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 05:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 05:14 pm (UTC)I'm going for a lie down.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 06:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-14 08:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-08-15 03:34 pm (UTC)