ewx: (Default)
Richard Kettlewell ([personal profile] ewx) wrote2006-09-23 10:57 am
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Entry tags:
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2006-09-23 10:46 am (UTC)(link)
Can't I have the Semantic Web instead?
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2006-09-23 10:59 am (UTC)(link)
It would appear not.

[identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com 2006-09-23 11:19 am (UTC)(link)
I'll just have to take these warmed-over remnants of Good Old-Fashioned AI back to the shop, then.

[identity profile] uon.livejournal.com 2006-09-23 11:34 am (UTC)(link)
What for?

[identity profile] uisgebeatha.livejournal.com 2006-09-23 11:15 am (UTC)(link)
Aw rats, no-one loves Web 2.0! But just think of the shiny useful sites that'll spring up! Like...er....more blogs! ;)

(PS- added you on t'other journal; didn't notice you on there till last night. ^_^)
ext_8007: Drinking tea (Default)

[identity profile] auntysarah.livejournal.com 2006-09-23 11:37 am (UTC)(link)
Am I allowed to be completely indifferent to both?
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (i think too much)

[identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com 2006-09-23 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Honestly, i think i'd rather have neither, despite the fact that Web 2.0 includew AJAX which is pretty frickin' nifty, and without HTML 2.0 we don't have HTML 3 or 4 which really aren't too bad even though i think HTML 2.0 is what introduced frames and god i hated those things when they first came out.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only