(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-23 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
Can't I have the Semantic Web instead?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-23 10:59 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
It would appear not.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-23 11:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
I'll just have to take these warmed-over remnants of Good Old-Fashioned AI back to the shop, then.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-23 11:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uon.livejournal.com
What for?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-23 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uisgebeatha.livejournal.com
Aw rats, no-one loves Web 2.0! But just think of the shiny useful sites that'll spring up! Like...er....more blogs! ;)

(PS- added you on t'other journal; didn't notice you on there till last night. ^_^)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-23 11:37 am (UTC)
ext_8007: Drinking tea (Default)
From: [identity profile] auntysarah.livejournal.com
Am I allowed to be completely indifferent to both?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-23 03:47 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (i think too much)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
Honestly, i think i'd rather have neither, despite the fact that Web 2.0 includew AJAX which is pretty frickin' nifty, and without HTML 2.0 we don't have HTML 3 or 4 which really aren't too bad even though i think HTML 2.0 is what introduced frames and god i hated those things when they first came out.

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags