ewx: (Default)
[personal profile] ewx

After behaving for quite a while my car went back to its habit of refusing to start. The RAC engineer seemed more open-minded about the solution than previous ones (it's had two new starter motors to no effect...) and thought it was the ignition switch itself, evidence for this being that connecting the starter directly to the battery started it while turning the key continues not to.

While I was thinking of replacing the car anyway very soon I'd like to be able to reliably start it if only to get it to whatever place I finally part company with it, and conceivably for emergencies. Replacing the ignition switch would be expensive and not 100% certain (perhaps the fault lies somewhere in the relatively inaccessible region between the switch and the starter). But the engineer suggested a rather cheaper workaround.

The idea is to run a wire from the +ve terminal of the battery, via a 30A fuse and a switch on the dashboard, to the starter directly. (i.e. to emulate the green line on this diagram, not the red one.)

But I'm not exactly an electrician; does anyone who knows what they're talking about think this is a sane/insane thing to try?

(updated to link to diagram)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hsenag.livejournal.com
I have no idea what I'm talking about, but it does sound like a good recipe for theft :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brrm.livejournal.com
I think the theory would be that this switch would just be to take the starter motor (solenoid) current, relieving this load from the key switch. The key switch would presumably still be used to turn on the ignition, so the car wouldn't start without it. Seems sane to me, and indeed it's what my dad did for his old VW bus (where the distance from cabin to the engine at the rear of the car was causing problems with the starter).

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 01:37 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I don't believe turning the starter motor with the rest of the cars electrics powered down is going to get a thief very far. (And they'd have to actually want to steal it, too; we're not exactly talking a hot hatch here.)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hsenag.livejournal.com
Ah, right. Like I said, I have no idea what I'm talking about :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com
I'm fairly convinced I don't know what I'm talking about.

I'd consider the possibility that safety-critical systems may be separately switched on by the ignition switch (or by relays powered by the ignition switch)?

I'd wonder why it is that the ignition isn't wired that way, but uses a relay (presumably so that the massive current drawn by the starter motor doesn't go through the switch itself). I think you might have a job finding a switch that could reliably and safely handle the load a starter motor would put on it.

Might the "thing between the ignition switch and the starter" that you hypothesise is causing the problem, be said relay? In which case, if it's like various cars I've had unhappy dealings with, the relay may well be more accessible than the intermediate bits of wiring. Haynes manuals may be worth a browse?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ghoti.livejournal.com
I know a little bit, as I've just finished a car maintenance course, and it sounds like it should work to me.

Good luck.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 02:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazyscot.livejournal.com
Directly to the starter is a bit worrying to me; the whole point of the starter solenoid is to minimise the distance of high-current cable runs, which are a potential fire risk if the cabling is at all flakey.

It certainly does sound like the solenoid may be involved in the problem. <speculation type=wild> Perhaps there's damp getting into the solenoid? </speculation>

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 02:12 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
There's a relay inside the starter motor housing; the RAC engineer's technique for manually starting the car bypassed pretty much everything except that (i.e. it's not "between" in the relevant sense).

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mobbsy.livejournal.com
Sounds like valuable training for hot-wiring cars should the Cambridge IT market get any worse.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 02:34 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com

By "starter" I mean the entire starter motor unit, not the solenoid itself. More specifically, I propose to emulate the green line on this diagram (http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/junk/wiring.jpeg), rather than the red one (which doesn't include a switch).

I'm confident that the root of the problem lies outside the starter (three starters, of two models, have all exhibited it) though obviously this doesn't rule out a chain that ends within it.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com
If I read the diagram right (which would have been a lot easier had I read the comments first, and so not having to rely only on my knowledge of 1920's goods-lift wiring) it seems that what you're saying is this.

The green wire first carries current directly from the battery positive terminal through the fourth position (start) on the ignition switch and thence to the starter-motor enclosure, thence to earth via the chasis. Inside which there is a solenoid or relay which engages high-current contacts to connect the starter motor across the battery. There being no latching, when the current to the solenoid is removed, the high-current circuit is disconnected.

Presumably the solenoid is in the same enclosure as the starter motor, and has been replaced each time, so probably isn't directly responsible for the failures. The starter-motor earth must be good, because activation with direct connection of the motor, seems to work when the system is failing.

If you have a period of reliable failure, you could perhaps check, with a multimeter and manipulation of the plug, if there's a voltage wrt ground at the starter-motor plug when you try to start (there should be, I think). You could further check, in a period of reliable failure, if shorting the battery against the solenoid pin (the end of the green wire) starts the motor. That would place the fault definately somewhere on the green route.

The part of the green circuit between the battery and ignition switch is, rather endeeringly, four-way-redundant, so I doubt that's the failure, and anyway, that also supplies the 'running' positions of the switch, so if that was faulty, you'd not be able to run the engine after jump-starting it. So it could be worth testing the switch output, with a meter, during failure, to see if the fault is in the switch or the end of the cable run. If you've a voltage on the switch but the engine doesn't start, then you could just replace the final part of the run of the green wire, between the switch and the starter. If it's the switch, you could either replace it or, cheaper, have a start switch shorting the input and fourth position. Then you'd need the key to operate the vehicle, to enable the running electronics, to start you'd simply use the key as before, sometimes pressing the switch whilst you are in position four (starting) if position four seems to do nothing.

[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<:)>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

If I read the diagram right (which would have been a lot easier had I read the comments first, and so not having to rely only on my knowledge of 1920's goods-lift wiring) it seems that what you're saying is this.

The green wire first carries current directly from the battery positive terminal through the fourth position (start) on the ignition switch and thence to the starter-motor enclosure, thence to earth via the chasis. Inside which there is a solenoid or relay which engages high-current contacts to connect the starter motor across the battery. There being no latching, when the current to the solenoid is removed, the high-current circuit is disconnected.

Presumably the solenoid is in the same enclosure as the starter motor, and has been replaced each time, so probably isn't directly responsible for the failures. The starter-motor earth must be good, because activation with direct connection of the motor, seems to work when the system is failing.

If you have a period of reliable failure, you could perhaps check, with a multimeter and manipulation of the plug, if there's a voltage wrt ground at the starter-motor plug when you try to start (there should be, I think). You could further check, in a period of reliable failure, if shorting the battery against the solenoid pin (the end of the green wire) starts the motor. That would place the fault definately somewhere on the green route.

The part of the green circuit between the battery and ignition switch is, rather endeeringly, four-way-redundant, so I doubt that's the failure, and anyway, that also supplies the 'running' positions of the switch, so if that was faulty, you'd not be able to run the engine after jump-starting it. So it could be worth testing the switch output, with a meter, during failure, to see if the fault is in the switch or the end of the cable run. If you've a voltage on the switch but the engine doesn't start, then you could just replace the final part of the run of the green wire, between the switch and the starter. If it's the switch, you could either replace it or, cheaper, have a start switch shorting the input and fourth position. Then you'd need the key to operate the vehicle, to enable the running electronics, to start you'd simply use the key as before, sometimes pressing the switch whilst you are in position four (starting) if position four seems to do nothing.

<:)>Btw, always cut the green wire, never the red wire, or is it the other way around?</:)>

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-04 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mtbc100.livejournal.com
Ah, great. Sounds good then. The last guy to buy a car from me arrived in a car that one starts by touching bare ends of wire together.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-05 12:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kensei.livejournal.com
Yes, that will work. Good idea.

I used to have a switch in a hard-to-find place connected to that wire so that even if someone broke in, they couldnt start the engine.

Use a push-to-make press button switch, rather than a rocker or "throw" switch.

Good idea

Date: 2004-01-05 01:10 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Localizing the problem and having a shorter bypass around just that sounds like it might be easier, yes.

There's a relay inside the starter motor housing

Date: 2004-01-05 01:16 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Or at least, some kind of switch.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-05 04:29 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (car)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
I agree that this will work. But since this is only a switching circuit, I'd use a 5A fuse not 30A. Make sure the fuse goes between the battery and the dashboard switch, of course, or it doesn't protect you, only the starter motor!

One benefit of a 5A fuse is that you could safely use a much thinner wire. (Obviously, the wire has to be a higher rating than the fuse.)

You need to tell your insurer you've done this to the car. If the car is insured against theft, they'll have the heebie-jeebies, so consider downrating to third party only, whereby they'd presumably not give a damn (but still need to be told). In practice, I don't honestly think it makes much difference to the security, since you still need the ignition key to unlock the steering and get the fuel ignition/pumping systems going. On that topic, I assume you've already thought to make sure all the other essential electrics do still work?

As for safety, provided you don't touch any live wires, I'd say the worst that could realistically happen is you blow the fuse. The more likely failure mode is simply that nothing happens, and it working is a more likely outcome still. Good luck. (-8

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-05 05:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-lark-asc.livejournal.com
*takes notes*

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags