(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-31 08:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephdairy.livejournal.com
You evil evil person. But I'd rather read about Diana because there are interesting historical ramifications to do with the monarchy.

(S)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-31 08:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksta.livejournal.com
how are there ramifications?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-31 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephdairy.livejournal.com
There was a point, when the Queen was holed-up in Balmoral and the public were going hysterical about Diana, where the popular mood began to get a bit nasty. I think at that point, had the Queen not returned to London and addressed the nation, a swelling of republican leanings could have posed a real threat to the future of the Monarchy.

What actually happened is that the shock of the event was the impetus for the Palace to adapt to the new world of 24-hour news and media management: the Monarchy emerged stronger.

(S)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-31 09:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksta.livejournal.com
wow, just because she died in an accident. crazy, eh?
I'm not particularly pro- or anti-monarchy, but for goodness' sake...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-08-31 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
Also the Private Eye coverage of Diana was much funnier.

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags