Bug #1 (revisited)

[ewx]

Further to this...

So far Alioth is out as it appears to be only for Debian developers (though the front page and project registration form sneakily don't tell you this, implying instead that it's for “Open Source developers” in general) and Savannah is out because the hosting requirements insist on GFDL for manuals, and DisOrder's documentation is GPL'd and are likely to remain that way (the point being that you can copy and modify the documentation exactly when you can do so to the source code).

That leaves Sourceforge, which although it seems to be a bit quicker than I remember it is annoyingly infested with adverts, and Launchpad, which I've had one commenter in favor of and one recommendation against (albeit without an explanation as to why).

Comments

[gareth-rees.livejournal.com]

Why not dual-licence the documentation?

[covertmusic.livejournal.com]

http://code.google.com/ ? I'm using it.

[emperor]

Savannah do say they'll review other licence use on a case-by-case basis, so you could ask if they'd accept GPL documentation for disorder?

[ewx.livejournal.com]

That one didn't come up last time round. Interesting; thanks for the pointer.

[ewx.livejournal.com]

Because relicensing my work just to get a bug tracker is completely ridiculous? Also true of having to agree to say "GNU/Linux" instead of "Linux", in fact.

[ewx.livejournal.com]

It's nice and fast, it doesn't have any ads, it doesn't require endless practical or ideological hoops. http://code.google.com/p/disorder/ (http://code.google.com/p/disorder/). Now to turn my wishlist into bugs and wonder if I can expose my bzr tree as a subversion repository.

[pm215]

FWIW, the person I suggested google code to wasn't able to use it because Google don't accept projects using the AGPL license...

[ewx.livejournal.com]

Feh l-(