ewx: (Default)
[personal profile] ewx
[Poll #229421]

By assumption the change would be a perfect physical change, rather than current-day surgery, and would affect genetically determined facts about the person, not acquired ones; i.e. nature is changed, not nurture. Whether the change would be temporary or not is up to you. You may list yourself if you want and (only) if you do you can list an extra person.

Leave reasoning (if you have any l-) in a comment.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-06 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sesquipedality.livejournal.com
What an odd question. The answer is the same in both cases, but I'm not really willing to say who.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-06 03:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com
Selfish bugger, aren't I? :)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 01:09 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
IRTA "shellfish".

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-06 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ali-in-london.livejournal.com
Oh dear, I ned to explain this one, don't I (am horribly pissed, so this might be entertaining and will almost get me killed by various parties).

OK, [livejournal.com profile] shadow_jess has this habit of dating... interesting men. Complicated men. Difficult men. Men who occasionally cross the fuckwit boundary.

However, her taste in girlfriends is impeccable. Hence my suggestion of turning [livejournal.com profile] kitty_goth from a boyfriend into a girlfriend.


Re: [livejournal.com profile] nou's answer. Errrr. *ponder*

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 02:02 am (UTC)
juliet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] juliet
I think I object to that. I quite like him as a bloke. Although I'm glad you approve of jess' taste in girlfriends :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ali-in-london.livejournal.com
Oh I like him too, but that doesn't mean he's not complicated.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vyvyan.livejournal.com
I believe he'd prefer it that way.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 01:28 am (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
1) because it would be greatly amusing :)

2) for doing such daft polls :-p

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 04:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-lark-asc.livejournal.com
(2) makes no sense. Girls are just as capable of posting daft polls :)

.. what I'm curious about is why Mobbsy was telling him to survey the populace on this topic in the first place :)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 05:00 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
He was predicting it, not telling me to, actually; I don't recall exactly how the idea arose originally.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 11:01 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (female-mallard-frontal)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
I've not chosen anyone. Instead, I'd like to offer the contrarian view that it really matters not a jot to me what sex someone is.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 11:19 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
I think they'd both be interested in it. Why those two, perhaps at least partly because they each already have quite a few characteristics usually associated with the other sex.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-07 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
Why me twice? Because I think it'd be nice for a visit [1] but I wouldn't want to stay.

[1] Not least for the thing we never see in Ranma - "heyy, let's see how _this_ works".

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-08 03:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffymormegil.livejournal.com
Unnecessary complication; temporariness is offered as an option in the rubric :)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-01-08 04:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
Then I'll take Question 1 temporarily and see if I like it before answering question 2.

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags