(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 11:21 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
Me too. Good at the sums, but I got my billions wrong way round, and couldn't remember the size of a googol.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 11:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] acronym.livejournal.com
Nine. Got the billions right, messed up the googol; but that's memorization of trivia, not maths, isn't it?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhk.livejournal.com
10. [livejournal.com profile] ewx taught me about googols.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 03:01 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I'm fairly sure I first encountered them from Dad.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 02:26 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (ascii)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
It depends. If you're going to say that knowing the magnitude of a billion or a googol is trivia, why not also the fact that there are 360 degrees in a circle (arguably, radians are the only "natural" measure of angle) or that a kilometre is a thousand metres?

Indeed, you could even try claiming that our denary place-digit system is trivia rather than mathematics. (-8

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 03:00 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Trivianess is not binary; I think the definition of a googol is probably well towards the trivia end of it, too. Not knowing a billion would be a bit more concerning, though - the term is relatively common. (But confusion is also excusable, given the persistence of the anachronistic 1012 version.)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mstevens.livejournal.com
I've never actually seen a billion used 'live' in the allegedly English sense, just read about it as a definition.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-24 03:27 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Granted a lot of the persistence is the fault of pedants rather than people who actually naturally use the archaic form.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-02-25 05:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] addedentry.livejournal.com
Pedantry which isn't a charming affectation but actively irresponsible.

(And the same goes for using imperial measurements in front of children.)

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags