Not eating their own dogfood
Oct. 27th, 2010 07:32 pmWhat are the chances that an antivirus company’s mail system will send you spam? Not so bad, it turns out. I wonder if their own antispam software would have caught it?
Received: from out05.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com ([216.99.131.18])
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.36 #1) with esmtp
(return-path ronmills88@yahoo.pl)
id 1PB9sE-0003j0-00--sauce
for [me]; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:33:18 +0100
X-SAUCE-Notice: (chiark.greenend.org.uk) Irritated 15389ms (delays likely)
with out05.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com [216.99.131.18]
Received: from out05.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com ([216.99.131.18])
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (SAUCE v0.9.0)
with esmtp id sauce-19005-1288200-1; 27 Oct 2010 17:33:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from out09.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com (unknown [216.99.131.46])
by out05.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75DF44C470
for <[me]>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay02.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com (unknown [10.30.239.77])
by out09.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8466A980448;
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.taf.com.au (unknown [203.110.128.170])
by relay02.sjc.mx.trendmicro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25E595887;
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:08:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from User ([41.217.65.5]) by mail.taf.com.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:31:52 +1100
Reply-To: <drexjohnson@yahoo.cn>
From: "FBI"<ronmills88@yahoo.pl>
Subject: FBI/IMF HAS APPROVED YOUR ATM CARD FOR DELIVERY
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:31:48 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <RCGEX1gxLDp7mvjkO22000010dc@mail.taf.com.au>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2010 14:31:55.0707 (UTC) FILETIME=[B488A0B0:01CB75E3]
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
To: undisclosed-recipients:;