(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keirf.livejournal.com
They'd be an excellent target for thieves.

I especially liked the penultimate paragraph:

We're designing the system in such a way that the barrels are very stupid - so that they are very reliable and inexpensive.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 02:49 am (UTC)
ext_15802: (Default)
From: [identity profile] megamole.livejournal.com
Did you notice the comment from Ass Professor Shane Farritor?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 03:13 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (rubberducky)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
I vote we hack into the system and make a million bollards descend on 10 Downing Street.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 03:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
"At that price I believe the savings will mean it will still be affordable if one dies in the line of duty,"

What an odd way of phrasing it. If one dies in the line of duty then it's a bit too late to afford any savings.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 05:50 am (UTC)
fanf: (photo)
From: [personal profile] fanf
Daleks are cheaper than people.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 07:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
I could see that that's what he was getting at, but it still seemed an odd way of saying it.

Apparently I misinterpreted the exact point he was making but I still think it could have been put better.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 08:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com

No sink plungers. Not daleks.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-29 09:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
See also http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Flocking_20Road_20Cones#1083255988 for discussion of similar ideas.

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags