(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 10:23 am (UTC)
ext_15802: (Default)
From: [identity profile] megamole.livejournal.com
See my Silicon Macs one.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 10:27 am (UTC)
aldabra: (Default)
From: [personal profile] aldabra

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 10:41 am (UTC)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (ewe)
From: [personal profile] liv
I think the Gmail one may not be a joke, actually. The service launched on April 1st last year, and everybody was saying it was an April fool, don't be ridiculous, nobody's going to give a gigabyte of storage space on a free email system!

The latest News post is a fairly obvious one.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
The storage looks to be rising at a rate of 10kb/sec, which would give ~30G after a year. Is that possible? Of course, it may be acc- or de-celerating.

If it's acccelerating, it may even reach infinity, but that'd be difficult to provide. I wouldn't be surprised if google didn't branch out into spoft drinks, the brand'd sell, wouldn't it? :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:12 am (UTC)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (likeness)
From: [personal profile] liv
You're right, they've presented it in a silly way; I didn't initially see the main Gmail page because I was automatically logged in when I went to look. So I only saw the (presumably serious) news announcement.

Actually, I'm not sure infinite (or at least, unlimited) storage is completely impossible. If you can offer an upper limit that's so high most users will never reach it, then just removing the cap altogether seems plausible. Assuming the service is restricted to legitimate use for personal email, which might be difficult to enforce, but theoretically at least, it's hard to imagine how users would ever go over a few tens of GB.

At the moment Google don't seem to be too concerned about people using their Gmail accounts effectively as a free idrive. But I don't see why they shouldn't say, no upper limit but if you go over 10GB we'll check you're really using the account for personal rather than business purposes.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I was careful not to say infinite[1] which is the same) storage is impossible; It seems unlikely, but I can just imagine some super-fractal method. Or, more to the point, they could claim it's unlimited if it's really really big and they deal individually with people who REALLY take the piss.

[1] Assuming infinite refers to aleph-null. Aleph-null + 1 would be the same. Aleph-1 would be... hard, and require some sort of analog storage. Omega would be logically impossible, I *think* :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] senji.livejournal.com
I expect to go over 100GB of mail per year in about a decade.

And that's not counting spam.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 04:41 pm (UTC)
liv: cartoon of me with long plait, teapot and purple outfit (likeness)
From: [personal profile] liv
Seriously? The total email I've ever archived in my life (ok, that's only since 1997 because I didn't know about email before then) is well under 100 MB. And I'm a packrat, I keep absolutely everything I could ever possibly want again. I would be surprised if I archive as little as 10% of everything I receive, but I suppose counting spam it's not impossible. But that still gives a yearly rate in the order of hundreds of MB, even at an exceedingly generous estimate.

I'm trying to think of a way you're receiving three to four orders of magnitude more email than I am! I mean, I'm sure I'm on the low end of the scale but that's a huge difference. I suppose if you're regularly using email to share huge files?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] senji.livejournal.com
Well, I've kept over 100M in the last 6 months, and my currently held opinion is that the volume of mail I wanted doubles every 12 - 18 months, which gives somewhere between a 200 and 1000 multiplier in volume over a decade.

OK, extrapolation is bad and I should actually keep some statistics on this, but it's probably OK as a handwavy sort of thing.

My total mail archives since 1999 are about 400M, the archives for the three years before then are still on (about 20) floppies...

As a worrying counterpoint. "All spam" aimed at me seems to double every 3-6 months and "Unfiltered spam" every 6-9.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-03 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teleute.livejournal.com
Adrian reckons he gets a gig every three months or so. 10MB a day, apparently. yeesh. no wonder he has to check it so much :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-04 09:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
My spam trap currently stands at 1.11GiB, having been reset on October 27, 2003. That's about 2.2MiB per day on average. And I hardly check it at all.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 10:49 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 10:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Motley Fool to form its own political party (http://www.fool.co.uk/news/comment/2005/c050401d.htm)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffymormegil.livejournal.com
The thing about that one is, it's got some nicely sensible proposals :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mobbsy.livejournal.com
The Ubuntu login splash screen is full of hairy developers hugging each other.

It's very scary.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kjaneway.livejournal.com
Sharks released into Manchester ship canal (http://www.salford.gov.uk/council/pressreleases/pressrelease.htm?id=45928)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:29 am (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bishonen/European_toilet_paper_holder

Wikipedia's toilet-paper-holder article probably counts.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bjh21.livejournal.com
NetBSD imports qmail (http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2005/04/01/0002.html)
... and switches to a Dvorak keyboard layout by default (http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/pckbport/pckbd.c)
... and adds Tetris to the set of things bundled into /rescue (http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2005/04/01/0008.html) (anyone would think NetBSD developers had nothing better to do)
Debian stops accepting new maintainers and cancels non-Cabal accounts (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/04/msg00000.html)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mpinna.livejournal.com
Bush twins volunteer (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/01/bush_twins_volunteer)
RFC 4041 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4041.txt)
Boring boring (http://boringboring.org/)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
Prince Charles to become countryside tsar (http://www.guardian.co.uk/monarchy/story/0,2763,1449949,00.html) (Camilla to be featured as the face of Duchy Originals biscuits).

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 12:34 pm (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
And of course there's the ones that look like April Fools but aren't:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4400535.stm

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 12:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazyscot.livejournal.com
Two Lumps (http://twolumps.keenspace.com/d/20050401.html) marked the occasion.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
Shocking treatment (http://www.livejournal.com/community/suggestions/526856.html) for users who don't stick to community rules.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 01:09 pm (UTC)
ext_4030: Branch of holly with its binomial name, Ilex aquifolium (Default)
From: [identity profile] strangefrontier.livejournal.com
Little Gamers shut down for torrent dealings. (http://www.little-gamers.com/)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 02:02 pm (UTC)
ext_4030: Branch of holly with its binomial name, Ilex aquifolium (top gear : richard driven)
From: [identity profile] strangefrontier.livejournal.com
Yes, now I realise a little elucidation helps! Little Gamers is, on most other days of the year, a foul-mouthed but cute gaming webcomic.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mpinna.livejournal.com
Moon to be eaten by bacteria (http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050328/full/050328-10.html)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 01:19 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 03:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
"Doctor Who, returning to the BBC after 15 years, will return next year without Christopher Eccelston as the 9th Doctor. Instead, Groucho Marx, Chico Marx, and Harpo Marx will be cast as the 10th, 11th, and 12th Doctors, respectively. Breaking with previous tradition, the three Doctors will work in tandem throughout the season, usually attempting some light-hearted swindle or love-affair as the universe falls down around them."
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:April_1%2C_2005/2005_Britannica_takeover_of_Wikimedia

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] duncanneko.livejournal.com
iCopulate (http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/icopulate.shtml)...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jumbach.livejournal.com
How about this one (http://www.livejournal.com/~jumbach/449002.html?nc=3)?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teleute.livejournal.com
I want that fondue set! It glows!!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 08:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
Either I just hallucinated, or LJ got adjusted so that the Update Journal button runs away from your mouse briefly, then when you click it, it says "Processing Whining".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knell.livejournal.com
and (I'm amazed this hasn't been all over my friends list today - only noticed it just now):
http://www.livejournal.com/update.bml?mode=full
has a little gotcha hidden in the "update journal" button..
(verified by checking the source)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knell.livejournal.com
uh.. and then I just looked at the comment just above this one. Ignore me.

It is indeed true, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 08:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
Hey, I only spotted it at 9pm (BST). Mind you the first entry to my own LJ today was 5 minutes earlier.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceb.livejournal.com
Charles Stross attains posthuman status (http://www.locusmag.com/2005/Features/0401_Stross.html) (pp fanf)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-01 11:14 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
What took him so long??

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-02 01:40 pm (UTC)
pm215: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pm215
Bit late, and found via slashdot so perhaps you've seen it, but Peter Seebach's article on optimising the idle loop with Altivec instructions amused me...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-04-02 02:02 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Thanks. I don't read slashdot any more...

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags