Spiders

Aug. 10th, 2005 01:08 am
ewx: (photos)
[personal profile] ewx

(Arachnophobes keep well clear!)

The first one could have done with a smaller aperture, but it's a little late in the evening to go back and ask for another go l-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 08:04 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Goodness me. The first one looks pretty familiar; I've seen lots of spiders like that, up to about an inch and a bit across (including the legs). The second is quite unusual and impressive. With those really thick legs, I'm guessing it was a lot smaller than the other one? How big?

(Should have left a ruler casually lying around each shot :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 08:05 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Ah, no, I've just spotted the blu-tack. Oops. Should have waited until I woke up properly :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 08:35 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Becky was saying the second one had fooled people before, though I didn't expect the photo to get anyone! For the record the first was under an inch including legs.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 08:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beckyc.livejournal.com
Not exactly, I said it frightened people ;-).

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] juggzy.livejournal.com
Hi - did you get the Xena icon? I sent it to your lj email.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 10:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beckyc.livejournal.com
No :-(, when did you send it? (I have problems with that address on and off and sometimes only get things three weeks later)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] juggzy.livejournal.com
Pretty much the day after you said you'd like one.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 08:42 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
I'd have found it hard to believe the second one was a large spider, but as a really tiny one (bearing in mind that I don't have any real idea of the limitations of your shiny camera lenses and the plain background removes all scale clues) it might have been credible at first glance.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com
And so we learn the hidden wisdom of LJ: He who would comment wisely would engage brain before putting electrons to screen.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 08:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beckyc.livejournal.com
The first one could have done with a smaller aperture, but it's a little late in the evening to go back and ask for another go l-)

I'm afraid that I unceremonously dumped the first one outside this morning so I could use my bath, so no more piccies :-(. It's come out really well.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 10:17 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I'm sure I'll encounter other interesting gribblies to shoot l-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-08-10 10:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mobbsy.livejournal.com
Try to shoot the headcrabs before you get too close.

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags