ewx: (Default)
[personal profile] ewx
[Poll #603391]

(i.e. where do you think he'll end up, not where would you like him to.)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 10:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beingjdc.livejournal.com
I think he's brilliantly placed for a leadership bid.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 10:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephdairy.livejournal.com
Back in cabinet within a year or two.

(S)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burkesworks.livejournal.com
In your dreams, John. Only in your dreams.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] songster.livejournal.com
I forecast a few years on the back benches, followed by leaving politics in an official capacity but continuing to be a mover and shaker in Blair's disgusting cabal of unelected, unaccountable "advisers".

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beingjdc.livejournal.com
He's got my four votes.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burkesworks.livejournal.com
Four? Whatever happened to OMOV?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beingjdc.livejournal.com
Party member, trade union member, fabian society member, christian socialist.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lusercop.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm inclined to think this too... :-/

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beingjdc.livejournal.com
God I hate people who take advice.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-lark-asc.livejournal.com
Prostitution. In a couple of years Blair will be hounded out of politics atogether by scandal, when he's discovered to be one of Blunkett's most regular clients.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burkesworks.livejournal.com
I don't ever remember having three votes as a Party member, a trade union member, and a Campaign Group member back when I used to be involved in the Labour Party back in the days of beer and sandwiches in smoke-filled rooms..

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knell.livejournal.com
I'm not. He made the PM look bad. All the warm tributes coming from Number 10 are just what happens at times like this, and in reality it was lucky for him that he wasn't directly sacked but had the opportunity to resign.

Making the PM look bad is not the kind of thing which is likely to get you on the fast track to forgiveness in the political world.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knell.livejournal.com
Absolutely. Far better politicians make decisions based on their own possibly shaky grasp of, say, economics or civil engineering than get advice.

I'm not sure why people expect political advisors to be elected. It's like expecting to vote for who gets to be the government's chief medical officer, or head of the Office of National Statistics.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beingjdc.livejournal.com
Yes well, the campaign group isn't an affiliated organisation, and the trade unions had a habit of block voting.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
I nearly misread that as "back in cabaret"… scary thought.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-11-02 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mtbc100.livejournal.com
I haven't been following things closely, but what I've not liked about Blair is that the advice coming from the advisers often doesn't seem to be generated or discussed in an especially public and peer-reviewed manner.

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags