ewx: (photos)
[personal profile] ewx

It's very bright at the moment. Personally it's detail I like to see, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-17 12:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-lark-asc.livejournal.com
Bastard bastard BASTARD.

I want a camera that can do that.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-17 01:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
It has a *really* badass flash. You just have to hold still for a *very* long time :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-17 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
You'd have to hold still for an extremely long time if you're waiting for the light of the flash to bounce off the Moon and come back. :o)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-18 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
That was the point yes. But only two and a half seconds, which is long by exposure time, but not *extremely* long in terms of astronomical distances.

If you're looking for practical difficulties, "illuminating the whole moon" is probably worse.

A patent fivemack recipe

Date: 2005-12-17 10:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fivemack.livejournal.com
If you have access to a normal compact digicam and a pair of binoculars, and are prepared for Some Faff, you can probably achieve results of that order ... you need to hold the binocs to the camera lens, focus the camera at infinity, focus the binocs until focussed, take photo. HOLD EVERYTHING STILL.

10x binoculars on a 100-mm-equivalent lens (the far end of the optical zoom on most compact digicams) give you the equivalent of a lens twice as long as rjk used for that shot.

I've managed this on terrestrial targets, I've got some quite nice video from the Fairford air show; I tried with my telescope on the Moon and got nothing, but my telescope is hopelessly wobbly.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-17 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazyscot.livejournal.com
I'm thinking of investigating getting a mirror lens for my camera so I can do things like that...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-17 11:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephdairy.livejournal.com
It's apparently just passed its highest point in the sky for eighteen years and is also (possibly connectedly; my planetary physics is not what it should be) quite close to the earth at the moment.

(S)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags