Prostitution
Sep. 11th, 2007 01:31 pm[Poll #1053551]
(NB for the last two questions - "results viewable to none" means "viewable to
ewx", and of course in theory to LJ's operators.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 12:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 01:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 01:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 01:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 01:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 01:08 pm (UTC)So I think I've argued myself into the position that one certainly shouldn't punish the prostitutes themselves, and that punishing their customers is probably not the ideal way to solve the problem in principle. However, it might conceivably be that other approaches turn out to work less well in practice and hence criminalising the customers is the best approach in practice; I lack the detailed knowledge to decide whether this is true (although a column in the Grauniad today was arguing persuasively that it isn't).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 03:32 pm (UTC)The only measures that have proven effective in terms of safety are those of toleration; the only measures that have ever achieved a reduction in visible activity (rather than displacement) are measures taken against the punters - 'naming and shaming' being a particularly effective case in point.
In practice, the enforcement of the law always ends up with the removal of all legal protection from the women selling sex and - eventually - active persection by the organs of the state. No matter how enlightened or tolernt or even-handed it is at the beginning.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-11 06:23 pm (UTC)