Well, I may half not want to know, but somebody's got to ask. How did you achieve that? By declaring a function with 2^n-22 arguments for some appropriately gigantic n, or by some other compiler bug?
Actually I just missed out a comma. http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=298182 (http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=298182) has an example.
Ah yes. We seem to be using a different version of VS here at work, and when I try it I get the disappointingly plausible "term does not evaluate to a function taking 27025512 arguments" instead.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 09:59 am (UTC)What do you mean, there weren't any to start with?!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 10:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 12:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 12:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 12:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 01:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-23 02:14 pm (UTC)