ewx: (marvin)
[personal profile] ewx

If a user of an ISP tries to visit a website controlled by an identifiable legal person, which does not contain any pornography, but the ISP instead serves them a block page informing them that the website does contain pornography, has the person controlling the website been libeled by the ISP? (All three parties located in the UK.)

(If you think Cameron's latest wheeze won't lead to overblocking then you haven't been paying attention to the existing implementations.)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-07-22 12:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geekette8.livejournal.com
I don't think you have to wonder much on your first or second questions.

On your third: "There is a single entendre, but I don't know about a triple one." Oh - different Julian :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-07-22 01:01 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (by Redderz)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
Next preposterously tricky issue I bet they've barely considered: what about wireless hotspots? Who chooses whether or not those filter porn?

What about BT Fon? Does BT even have the technology to apply different filters to someone's own internet connection and the Fon service provided via their broadband?

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags