(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daneel-olivaw.livejournal.com
"...man and wife..." Grrr. Husband and wife.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 03:38 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Well, possibly; people talk about "their man" as well as "their husband".

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 04:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daneel-olivaw.livejournal.com
Given that the person I was quoting was the BBC journalist, I'd have hoped for more gender neutrality.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 07:36 am (UTC)
ext_193439: (vamp)
From: [identity profile] gwendraith.livejournal.com
Husband and woman then? ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 04:22 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (mallard)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
What's wrong with "couple"?

(Or "tuple", if things get really interesting...)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 04:33 am (UTC)
ext_193439: (Default)
From: [identity profile] gwendraith.livejournal.com
I was being funny ;-p Couple is perfect :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 04:52 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I think "couple" conveys slightly different information - it doesn't tell you whether they are married (or in this case, were pretending to be married).

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 05:52 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (Default)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
If married is important, why not "married couple"?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 05:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
Short for "a man and his wife", presumably. Doesn't seem anything worth getting worked up about.

Odd though that we don't have such similar constructions as "man and sister".

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags