(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 03:38 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Well, possibly; people talk about "their man" as well as "their husband".

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 04:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daneel-olivaw.livejournal.com
Given that the person I was quoting was the BBC journalist, I'd have hoped for more gender neutrality.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-01 07:36 am (UTC)
ext_193439: (vamp)
From: [identity profile] gwendraith.livejournal.com
Husband and woman then? ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 04:22 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (mallard)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
What's wrong with "couple"?

(Or "tuple", if things get really interesting...)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 04:33 am (UTC)
ext_193439: (Default)
From: [identity profile] gwendraith.livejournal.com
I was being funny ;-p Couple is perfect :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 04:52 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I think "couple" conveys slightly different information - it doesn't tell you whether they are married (or in this case, were pretending to be married).

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-02 05:52 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (Default)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
If married is important, why not "married couple"?

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags