(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 01:58 am (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
The gmail thing says "and it turns annoying spam e-mail messages into the equivalent of canned meat.", which suggests a joke to me (as does the idea of letting everyong have 1GB of space :)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 02:03 am (UTC)
ext_15802: (Default)
From: [identity profile] megamole.livejournal.com
However, talk to an acquaintance of mine within Google suggests that this might just be real.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com
It just doesn't seem funny enough to be April Fools.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com
Mm, the BBC is reporting this story (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3588933.stm) with a straight face.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 02:36 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (eye)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
The Google mail thing seems entirely plausible to me. Given they're using commodity hardware, the mail is probably going to be on IDE discs. If you buy in bulk, do a bit of RAID striping, and anticipate people not reaching anything like their 1GB quota for, say, three years, I reckon it'll cost them 10-20p per user to implement.

And they place advertisements in the user interface that relate to words found in the text of your e-mails. How quickly could they earn 20p from advertisers for doing that, I wonder?

Actually, I'm not totally convinced Clive Feather's ostracism proposal is a spoof, either. Especially since it was dated yesterday, not today.

The variant LJ userinfo text only shows up if you use their new interface, by the way. Since I use the trad. interface, I had to fire up a separate browser that didn't have my preferences cookie to see it.

dated yesterday

Date: 2004-04-01 02:46 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com

The "Date" field in the HTML version is completely broken. The real Date field is thus:

Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:00:01 +0100 (BST)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
The variant LJ userinfo text only shows up if you use their new interface

Oh, right… I thought the `variant text' just referred to the extra entry in Friends-Of. Interestingly, the new user doesn't show up in Joule (http://marnanel.org/joule?user=imc).

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 05:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tienelle.livejournal.com
I find it amusing that lj_serialadder's Friends page is empty.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 05:21 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
new interface: ah, that explains why I was wondering what people were on about the.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 05:26 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
I still can't spot any difference.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 05:41 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
screenshot (http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/junk/stalk.png)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 05:50 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
Ah, they must have fixed it perhaps at midday, since it certainly doens't look like that if I log off.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 06:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
It still says that here (using a fresh copy of Lynx, for example).

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 06:39 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
I need to tell the login options to expire when browser closes and actually quit in order to get the relevant cookie to go away. And then when I log in again I get a new one, so it disappears again. Side effect of automagically accepting all cookies I guess.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 06:23 am (UTC)
sparrowsion: (cat5)
From: [personal profile] sparrowsion
<confused> -- I've been seeing it with the old interface.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 09:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
There are two things to see: one, namely, the user [livejournal.com profile] lj_serialadder in your Friend-of list, is noticeable in both versions. The other, viz., the renaming of Friends and Friends-of to Stalking and Stalked-by, is only visible using the XColibur skin (because it was presumably done by editing the definition of that skin).

However, the latter has just now been changed back.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 09:15 am (UTC)
sparrowsion: (cat5)
From: [personal profile] sparrowsion
But I was seeing Stalking and Stalked-by in Dystopia. Really, I'm not imagining it.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-06 07:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
OK, you're not mad.

Apparently it's that they didn't change the UK-English version, not that they didn't change the Dystopia skin.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 02:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
The Independent story quoted on Ananova was also on Today this morning, with comments from the Indie's media chappie. Obviously a well-planned collaboration.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 02:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beingjdc.livejournal.com
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,1183184,00.html

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
From the Ananova link:
The Sun reckons Thames Valley police are fitting hawks with cameras in an effort to catch speeding drivers in Oxfordshire. It says the birds will swoop on drivers who have been spotted by their handlers.
Well we did see signs all along the I-95 in Virginia saying "speed limit enforced by aircraft"…

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 04:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lusercop.livejournal.com
The guardian story about mandelson doesn't have anything obvious to indicate that it's an April Fool. I mean, I hope it is, but what have I missed?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] addedentry.livejournal.com
Thanks for this!

Apparently the Telegraph reported a study from a Professor O'Lali about increasing morale at work, including inviting employees to enter the office backwards on Monday morning to make them feel as happy as they do leaving on Friday. (Can't find it online, but it might have been removed at midday along with The Guardian's April fool.)

Ha ha, only serious

Date: 2004-04-01 07:10 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (rubberducky)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
You know, I can see the HabiCase idea taking off for real, just so long as the rest of the system isn't too noisy for pets…

Re: Ha ha, only serious

Date: 2004-04-01 07:20 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I think there'd be a bit of a risk of roasted (or at least badly dehydrated) hamsters...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 07:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ghoti.livejournal.com
My favourite is still the one from several years ago, when Radio 1 and Radio 2 switched output for the entire morning (except for jingles)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-04-01 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sphyg.livejournal.com
There's a difference? ;P I liked the Tyrannosaurus rex genome project from last year. Bah, they've taken the page down but there's a copy here (http://www.lecb.ncifcrf.gov/~toms/paper/ev/trex/).

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags