(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-03 05:43 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
BBC online has had slightly iffy spelling for ages, I wouldn't care to compare it with the Guardian's either way though.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-03 04:10 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (Duckula)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
I think it's a different kind of error: The Grauniad tended to end up with typos in the traditional sense — errors in the setting of type for the newspaper. The fact that when they went to digital setting there were still a few errors was the source of much mirth, but there was a genuine improvement. With news.bbc.co.uk, I guess they just employ people whose English usage is a bit iffy, and don't have anyone more competent check articles before they go live. Also, it's fairly plain that many of their articles come from Macintoshes via someone who doesn't understand how the path from Mac to web can mangle quote marks.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-04 01:23 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
With unicode support now very widespread in browsers it's unclear that there's any excuse but incompetence for mangling quotes when converting to HTML...

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags