(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-03 05:21 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
Interesting phrase in that article: "well on to the road of recovery". I've always seen it before as "well on the road to recovery".

I wonder if this is a thinko for the more usual phrase, or if it reflects a different usage among other parts of the population, or if it's consciously intending to signify something (perhaps some management-speak along the lines of "recovery is the whole process, not the destination").

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-03 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wendym.livejournal.com
Or BBC News have poached The Grauniads subeditors...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-03 05:43 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
BBC online has had slightly iffy spelling for ages, I wouldn't care to compare it with the Guardian's either way though.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-03 04:10 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (Duckula)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
I think it's a different kind of error: The Grauniad tended to end up with typos in the traditional sense — errors in the setting of type for the newspaper. The fact that when they went to digital setting there were still a few errors was the source of much mirth, but there was a genuine improvement. With news.bbc.co.uk, I guess they just employ people whose English usage is a bit iffy, and don't have anyone more competent check articles before they go live. Also, it's fairly plain that many of their articles come from Macintoshes via someone who doesn't understand how the path from Mac to web can mangle quote marks.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-04 01:23 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
With unicode support now very widespread in browsers it's unclear that there's any excuse but incompetence for mangling quotes when converting to HTML...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-03 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nassus.livejournal.com
Sad that they would give up for their parrots health but hadnt obviously thought about the effect it was having on their kids *sigh*

(no subject)

Date: 2004-08-04 01:21 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I think they must just not ever think about consequences and effects unless they can actually see them. A regrettably common problem; I expect there'd be a lot less crime (i.e. as defined by law, rather than "just" things like making noxious fumes in someone else's airspace) if people were better at considering consequences.

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags