(no subject)
Sep. 4th, 2004 02:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ewxpjc50 wondered what would happen if you got other people to take this kind of test but answering for oneself, rather than themselves. So I'm interested in what answer people get if they answer according to how they think I would behave (not necessarily how I would answer.) (30, male, degree, IT, UK for the initial questions, or go straight in.)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 06:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 07:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 07:14 am (UTC)I wonder whether I just like masterminds, so project those qualities onto people I like but don't know very well.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 07:42 am (UTC)* Visionaries who put energy into achieving their goals
* Prefer to work independently and dislike inefficiency
* Think of themselves as logical, thorough and bright
* Value practicality and common sense above ideas and theories
I do dislike inefficiency quite intensely. Unless there's a specific reason for it, that is. And people being irrational and impractical and not displaying common sense can also really get on my nerves. But I rate harmony between people more highly than efficiency/rationality.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 07:49 am (UTC)Again, I'm not sure where 'intorovert' came from.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 06:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 07:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 02:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 02:46 pm (UTC)Going to answer, then?
I tried answering how I thought you might act and came up with realist (http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/mind/articles/personalityandindividuality/whatamilike/realist.shtml). Thought it occurs to me that the same risks exist answering for someone else as for oneself.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-05 12:47 am (UTC)And it is, apparently, what I think you are as well.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-04 01:24 pm (UTC)