ewx: (Default)
[personal profile] ewx

Apropos of this article.

[Poll #701581]

Notes:

  • If you're in a monogamous relationship then answer as if you were not - i.e. I'm asking about your opinion about the activity in general not about your current situation.
  • "Morally wrong for everybody" means you think nobody should do it. "Morally wrong for you but OK for other people" means you'd think you were being bad if you did it but wouldn't necessarily think the same of someone else doing it. "OK for everybody" means you wouldn't think anyone, including yourself, was being bad for it (even if they themselves would).
  • You can think it's distateful, or indication of something missing, without necessarily also thinking it's wrong.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-03 10:31 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com

If it's really ohmygodwhat - you might imagine tipsy flirting in which neither party backed down - then that might look rather like something deeper than friendship coming to the surface for the first time. As such a definition of casual sex which did encompass friends might nonetheless not include it. (The cliché in this case would be that everyone had worked it out some time before the people most directly concerned...)

But you might also imagine one deciding to try to pull the other just to see what happens and the other going along with it for the same reason, and the two of them deciding they liked the results on a more than informal basis. In that case, if you think sex between friends can be casual sex then that does seem like an example of starting out casual but ceasing to be so. (To balance the above parenthesis I guess the equivalent might be outside observers asking "...when did *they* start shagging?")

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags