ewx: (geek)
[personal profile] ewx

I've just spent 3 hours fixing [livejournal.com profile] naath's Debian unstable install over IRC; it was a real mess. Anyone who knows much about Debian will tell you that you shouldn't be running unstable if you're not capable of dealing with things breaking, and I quite agree, but apparently someone told her to use unstable.

If I were to bill said someone for my time, what do you think would be a reasonable hourly rate?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-16 09:10 am (UTC)
cjwatson: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cjwatson
I suspect this particular problem is due to Debian unstable being RIGHT in the middle of the enormously huge and painful transition to X.org 7.0. If [livejournal.com profile] naath had been following Ubuntu's development branch at the time when we made that same transition, she'd have had exactly the same problem; so I don't think that criticism is particularly fair here.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-04-16 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crazyscot.livejournal.com
Perhaps to some extent. But, there's less of a "just run unstable" mentality within Ubuntu unless you're actually developing at the bleeding-edge; it's much more likely that [livejournal.com profile] naath would have been running stable and so would be able to take advantage of whatever transition-from-breezy arrangements you folks build in...

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags