(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:12 pm (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
They should just grandfather in Pluto, and have done with it.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:15 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I was somewhat of that point of view until it was pointed out that it wouldn't be the first object to be downgraded from planetary status.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:29 pm (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
...were any of those in the solar system, though?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:31 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Apparently Ceres was originally termed a planet.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
There are only eight known planets in the Solar System; I've been saying for years.

The interesting option you missed out is the super-Jovian mass object in the Oort cloud hypothesised as the gravitational source of long-time comets (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/467572.stm). (I call it Krishna.)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:25 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Well, I didn't know about it. Still, it doesn't seem entirely unfair to exclude something that it's at best predicted to exist rather than known to in the way all the others are. Granted spotting it might be tricky...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
What does [livejournal.com profile] pseudomonas have against Jupiter (being the only person (or bacterium) to have voted for the Earth but not also Jupiter)?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bellinghman.livejournal.com
Especially since the original definition of planet included Jupiter, but excluded Earth.

(Earth obviously not being something that wandered around the sky.)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Some people, I don't know if any seriously, say there's some fusion in Jupiter, and it's a star?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
With what evidence? The dividing criteria between jovians and brown dwarfs is normally taken as the latter (a) being dense enough to undergo helium fusion (for a brief period) and (thereafter) convecting. I don't see much (surface) evidence of Jupiter convecting, and it's way below the gravity threshold for helium fusion; which is not to say it might not have been able to do other more esoteric forms of fusion, but if that ever happened, it was very briefly, and a very long time ago, and wouldn't have constituted more than a flash in the planet.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I've no idea. As I say, I don't know if anyone takes it at all seriously. But I've heard it, which is more than any other explanation for Jupiter not being a planet I've.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 03:21 pm (UTC)
fanf: (silly)
From: [personal profile] fanf
These people believe that 2010 is true?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
I meant to include "people who've read 2010" as well as "people who think it happens but haven't proof" in the "non-serious" category, but wasn't sure how to phrase it...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krabbe.livejournal.com
2001 DA42.

Because.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 02:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aardvark179.livejournal.com
I'm not voting for Juptirer. It may not be a brown dawrf now, but once our office plan to piss of the IAU by crashing Saturn into it happens...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
Don't try this at home, kids!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aardvark179.livejournal.com
I think the phrase, "Make sure you've got an irresponsible demiurge to help you," would be appropriate.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 07:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
And preferably one with a bit more competency than whoever arranged the last attempt (http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/sl9/image41.html).

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-24 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
I like the 'insensitive clod' option

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags