Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
ewx
's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
Richard Kettlewell
Recent Entries
Archive
Reading
Network
Tags
Memories
Profile
Giant Duck
Jul
.
11th
,
2007
07:18 pm
ewx
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-11 06:40 pm (UTC)
From:
bellinghman.livejournal.com
The fact that the bath is visible clearly demonstrates that this duck is insufficiently gigantic.
(It should also have fangs, but that's a whole other story.)
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-11 07:06 pm (UTC)
From:
gerald_duck
Ducks with fangs? Whatever next!
Maybe lots of giant ducks would be a better option than one gigantic duck?
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-11 09:22 pm (UTC)
From:
cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
You neglect the possibility that the galaxy in contained in a jewel on Naath's necklace, or maybe a vast sink:)
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-11 09:31 pm (UTC)
From:
bellinghman.livejournal.com
Are you saying she's a large lass? Shame on you!
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-11 09:40 pm (UTC)
From:
cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
To preserve both our honours, perhaps we should use the adjective "great" :)
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-11 09:44 pm (UTC)
From:
nevboo.livejournal.com
In a wonderful coincidence the next post I read after this contained this link http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2007/07/10/what_the_duck.html
Now that is a giant duck
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-11 09:46 pm (UTC)
From:
ewx.livejournal.com
See a couple of postings back
(http://ewx.livejournal.com/434415.html). But yes; I wonder if they could float it across the channel to a British port.
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-12 02:50 pm (UTC)
From:
bellinghman.livejournal.com
Hence 'this duck is insufficiently gigantic'.
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-12 03:17 pm (UTC)
From:
nevboo.livejournal.com
yeah, I spotted the earlier post after I responded. Perhaps I should keep my comments to myself ;)
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-12 03:33 pm (UTC)
From:
(Anonymous)
Or pay more attention
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-12 03:52 pm (UTC)
From:
nevboo.livejournal.com
Without meaning to needlessly fill your inbox I should say that the above comment was from me , when I left the page it said so but now it says anonymous. Just so you know no one making fighting talk on your LJ!
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-12 03:58 pm (UTC)
From:
ewx.livejournal.com
I did wonder... l-)
(no subject)
Date:
2007-07-16 04:45 pm (UTC)
From:
emperor
That's quite some duck.
Previous Entry
Add Memory
Share This Entry
Next Entry
13 comments
Reply
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Profile
Richard Kettlewell
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
February
2025
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Most Popular Tags
animals
-
8 uses
bees
-
8 uses
birds that are neither duck nor penguin
-
26 uses
birthdays
-
10 uses
books
-
61 uses
cambridge
-
11 uses
cat pictures
-
8 uses
comment
-
89 uses
disorder
-
37 uses
dr who
-
20 uses
ducks
-
22 uses
films
-
43 uses
flashforward
-
13 uses
flowers
-
8 uses
food
-
11 uses
forsale
-
8 uses
geek
-
244 uses
giveaway
-
28 uses
graffiti
-
7 uses
history
-
38 uses
holiday
-
29 uses
insects
-
23 uses
it hasn't happened until it's blogged
-
16 uses
language
-
15 uses
leopard
-
10 uses
life
-
202 uses
links
-
169 uses
linux
-
26 uses
mac
-
33 uses
macro
-
14 uses
memes
-
6 uses
moose
-
38 uses
news
-
6 uses
newstools
-
9 uses
nonsense
-
230 uses
penguins
-
7 uses
photography
-
360 uses
politics
-
63 uses
polls
-
223 uses
questions
-
30 uses
reviews
-
118 uses
software development
-
24 uses
spiders
-
17 uses
torchwood
-
13 uses
tv
-
53 uses
vcs
-
6 uses
videos
-
10 uses
weddings
-
6 uses
windows
-
10 uses
xmas
-
15 uses
Active Entries
1:
Fostering Dogs
2:
Making an effort to use my camera more
3:
Turkish Delight
4:
Computer junk
5:
Books, DVDs and VHS tapes(!) to give away
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-11 06:40 pm (UTC)(It should also have fangs, but that's a whole other story.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-11 07:06 pm (UTC)Maybe lots of giant ducks would be a better option than one gigantic duck?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-11 09:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-11 09:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-11 09:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-11 09:44 pm (UTC)Now that is a giant duck
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-11 09:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-12 02:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-12 03:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-12 03:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-12 03:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-12 03:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-16 04:45 pm (UTC)