(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 08:04 pm (UTC)
pm215: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pm215
Wrapping at 80 generally feels artificially narrow to me -- usually my first act with an 80-column anything is to make it wider. Usually I just wrap at however wide my emacs happens to be, which is usually somewhere between 100 and 132 columns. I think 80-wrapping code like this:
        hits = (find_next_bp_hit('INSTR_EXEC', None, self.swbps | self.hwbps, begints, endts, term),
                find_next_bp_hit('MEM_WRITE', 'watch', self.writewps | self.accesswps, begints, endts, term),
                find_next_bp_hit('MEM_READ', 'watch', self.readwps | self.accesswps, begints, endts, term),
                scan_terminator(begints, endts, term))
would hurt its readability somewhat, which is why I'm not much in favour of such a low width.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-11 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
Well, I'm glad to see I'm not the only one. :o)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-12 08:58 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
I think that's probably about the most readable that code is ever going to be, yes :)

(Seriously, I agree it would hurt it to wrap it at 80)

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags