ewx: (poll)
[personal profile] ewx

...an answer that has seen him dubbed the "Lib Dem Lothario" by some, while others have reinvigorated the nickname coined by his leadership rival, Chris Huhne: "Calamity Clegg". "Shagger" would also, of course, suffice.

I'm surprised they didn't come up with “Clegg over”. I think if I were a politician I'd not have answered the question at all, personally.

[Poll #1164588]

(Choose the nearest number, except only choose 0 if that's exactly right. Slightly odd scale is due to LJ imposing a limit of 20 items. Approximations acceptable.)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burkesworks.livejournal.com
Didn't do Paddy Pantsdown much harm in the long run...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 07:45 pm (UTC)
ext_44: (mobius-scarf)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
Nick Clegg would probably get Mark Morford's vote (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/04/02/notes040208.DTL&feed=rss.mmorford), and not just by virtue of being a Liberal Democrat.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 1ngi.livejournal.com
Is this just penetrative stuff or does any kind of sex count ;)
Edited Date: 2008-04-02 01:17 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:41 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I think if the people involved think it was sex (and aren't complete fruit-loops) then it counts.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] uisgebeatha.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 01:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 01:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] james-r.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 02:58 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] wildeabandon.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-07 12:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] james-r.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-07 12:28 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dave holland (from livejournal.com)
I don't understand LJ; but I had expected "results viewable to: None" to mean I wouldn't see the results. That's why one of your entries is a blank answer with "I'll tell you..." ticked. Yet I see the results.

Presumably "results" is LJ-speak for "raw votes"?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:29 pm (UTC)
pm215: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pm215
Somebody used 'Clegg over' on R4 today or last night, I forget which.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gareth-rees.livejournal.com
Slightly odd scale is due to LJ imposing a limit of 20 items.

This is the kind of application that Renard numbers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_numbers) (ISO 3) are good for. Taking the R10 series and rounding to the nearest whole number gives the following series of 19 items:

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 13, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, 63, 80, 100

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:39 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I'll do that next time...

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pne.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 01:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 01:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 02:21 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gareth-rees.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 02:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gareth-rees.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 02:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 04:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 05:04 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 11:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 11:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-03 12:01 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-03 12:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

I'm not embarrassed

Date: 2008-04-02 01:42 pm (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
15: of which 1 was a one-night-stand, 3 were with mates but didn't lead to going out, 4 were in short-ish relationships of a few months and 7 in long term relationships.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 01:43 pm (UTC)
emperor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] emperor
The Times used "Clegg-over" today, in the dead-tree edition at least.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uisgebeatha.livejournal.com
[x] Calculating that number over the average friendslist caused a stack overflow, you insensitive clod!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
There should have been an option for "I was forced to round up/down", I didn't feel it was fair to say "I lied" when I didn't have the option to tell the truth!

My total is actually the same as my current age (not for much longer though).

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:19 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
I don't think it's lying if you've followed specific instructions to round...

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 02:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 02:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 04:03 pm (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
"But I lied ... twice."

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 06:58 pm (UTC)
ext_44: (otp)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
I was going to make a very similar point. :-)

Like Hillary Clinton, we haven't lied; we have merely misspoke.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I had to round my cube number to a square number to enter this poll.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:21 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
From the possible candidates, one stands out as rather more likely than the others to have said that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com
I think you've slept with 8 people...

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 02:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 03:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 03:59 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 04:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 04:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-04-02 04:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-03 02:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bugshaw.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-04 09:47 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-04 10:20 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com
There are few things you can make squarer by rounding them. Cubes may be a possible candidate.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] perdita-fysh.livejournal.com
'1' seems like an odd number to have missed from the scale?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
Awww!

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-04-02 06:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 03:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ptc24.livejournal.com
I note that of all the people (so far) embarrassed by "it's too low", none of those said "zero".

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sphyg.livejournal.com
Quality beats quantity ;P

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 06:39 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Absolutely.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-02 04:05 pm (UTC)
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (bowler)
From: [identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com
I went with actual shagging. If we're talking third base, add 3.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-03 09:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephdairy.livejournal.com
If tennis with puppies doesn't count, baseball definitely doesn't!

(S)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-03 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vyvyan.livejournal.com
I can't really remember, especially for the early 90s. I made my best estimate.

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags